![]() ![]() ![]() Maybe they will, but I think the jury's still out. Maybe in another 10 yeasr or so, Canon will finally get it right. But it does need to support more Canon models. While on the subject of DPP 4, I must admit it is pretty nice (I try all the updates before going back to LR). After all, they could just punt and have it invoke DPP3, like they did with EOS wrote: But it's just plain silly that DPP4 isn't downwards compatible with DPP3. I can understand why Canon resists upgrading DPP3 to recognize DPP4's Exif data. ![]() Be sure to try them if you haven't already maybe they'll fix the problem.Īre you sure that DPP4 works with your XSi? (It doesn't with my 50D or my wife's T2i.) Note that DPP4 will open thumbnails from even a camera that it doesn't support, but it won't do anything else useful (even sort or rename, which is annoying). New releases of EOSU 3 and DPP4 came out last week. Also, most OS's have been 64 bulit for years.Ĭanon recently acknowledged a problem with some of the higher-end crop cameras that were supposed to work with EOS Utility V3, but didn't. However, my 70d which is a very recent camera pops up the older version of EOS utility v2 and my Rebel Xsi which is ancient works with either version 3 or 4 of DPP.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |